Use cases
Canonical four places we refuse to let drift happen.
FactumOS enforces deterministic behavior with receipts, snapshots, and a graph substrate built for auditors—not just for demos. Here’s where that matters most.
Compliance verification
Failure mode of LLM apps
- Answers vary by team, making audits feel risky.
- No one can show which version approved a decision.
What FactumOS enforces
- Every decision is recorded with sources and approvals.
- Receipts export cleanly for regulators and internal audit.
- Reviews can replay the exact decision path.
Outcome: Clean proofs that satisfy examiners the first time.
Policy interpretation
Failure mode of LLM apps
- Teams handle edge cases differently across regions.
- Reviewers lack full context, leading to uneven outcomes.
What FactumOS enforces
- Receipts show which policy sections were applied.
- Overrides and approvals are recorded in the receipt.
- Decisions stay consistent across regions.
Outcome: Consistent, explainable rulings across teams.
Risk assessment
Failure mode of LLM apps
- Notes can’t be audited because sources are unclear.
- Fallback rules get missed, so gaps go unseen.
What FactumOS enforces
- Receipts capture inputs, scores, and overrides with timestamps.
- Every decision ties back to the signals that drove it.
- Manual reviews and automated checks stay together.
Outcome: Defensible risk calls you can show to risk and legal.
High-stakes internal knowledge decisions
Failure mode of LLM apps
- Answers drift after updates, breaking consistency.
- No traceability when experts edit drafts or escalate.
What FactumOS enforces
- Receipts pin the content used for each answer.
- Edits, approvals, and timestamps stay with every revision.
- Escalations and automation share one receipt.
Outcome: Versioned, accountable answers leadership can sign off on.